Comments on: AS3 learning process: Stuff that wasn’t obvious #1 http://www.razorberry.com/blog/archives/2006/10/27/learning-as3-1/ since 2004! Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:14:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: nk http://www.razorberry.com/blog/archives/2006/10/27/learning-as3-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3188 nk Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:53:11 +0000 /?p=39#comment-3188 geniale : ) geniale : )

]]> By: Tomelloso http://www.razorberry.com/blog/archives/2006/10/27/learning-as3-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2303 Tomelloso Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:36:14 +0000 /?p=39#comment-2303 Useful article to learn the new AS3. Thanks. Useful article to learn the new AS3. Thanks.

]]> By: Atom http://www.razorberry.com/blog/archives/2006/10/27/learning-as3-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2040 Atom Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:53:56 +0000 /?p=39#comment-2040 XML is no good for data binding. That is the only reason I've had so far to convert an XML object to a generic Object object. Of course, you can always do what Adobe recommends and just convert your XML document to an XMLListCollection but I've been having a hard time wrapping my mind around all of the new XML classes. It's easier for now to just convert the XML object. XML is no good for data binding. That is the only reason I’ve had so far to convert an XML object to a generic Object object.

Of course, you can always do what Adobe recommends and just convert your XML document to an XMLListCollection but I’ve been having a hard time wrapping my mind around all of the new XML classes. It’s easier for now to just convert the XML object.

]]> By: Brett http://www.razorberry.com/blog/archives/2006/10/27/learning-as3-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1427 Brett Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:07:34 +0000 /?p=39#comment-1427 But that's the beauty of AS3 XML. It already *is* in an object, accessible via dot notation. I can't see many cases where you'd want to clone the XML objects to another class. So maybe they made your special case more weird, but they made normal XML duties 1000x better... But that’s the beauty of AS3 XML. It already *is* in an object, accessible via dot notation. I can’t see many cases where you’d want to clone the XML objects to another class. So maybe they made your special case more weird, but they made normal XML duties 1000x better…

]]> By: Dave http://www.razorberry.com/blog/archives/2006/10/27/learning-as3-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1370 Dave Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:27:42 +0000 /?p=39#comment-1370 Heh... sorry, my bad. I see what you're pointing out now - the indexOf method... nice. That will be handy. Heh… sorry, my bad. I see what you’re pointing out now - the indexOf method… nice. That will be handy.

]]> By: Dave http://www.razorberry.com/blog/archives/2006/10/27/learning-as3-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1369 Dave Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:26:18 +0000 /?p=39#comment-1369 Thanks for the AS3 info - just one thing array.splice has not changed - it's just as easy to delete an element from an array in AS2. Thanks for the AS3 info - just one thing array.splice has not changed - it’s just as easy to delete an element from an array in AS2.

]]> By: Ilya Burkaltsev http://www.razorberry.com/blog/archives/2006/10/27/learning-as3-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1367 Ilya Burkaltsev Mon, 25 Dec 2006 13:59:25 +0000 /?p=39#comment-1367 Hello. Where i can read more about DisplayObject? Hello. Where i can read more about DisplayObject?

]]>